A review of two reviews in the New York Times Book Review Section
This
year marks the 100th anniversary of the Russian Revolution. We might
also argue that this year marks 100 years of slander against the leaders of the
Russian Revolution. We can list all the wars carried out to supposedly save the
world from the so-called communist onslaught.
Fourteen nations, including the United States, joined in a war
to overthrow the government in the Soviet Union after the Russian Revolution.
The Nazi armies of Adolf Hitler caused the deaths of about 27
million people in their invasion of the Soviet Union.
In the United States, numerous people lost their jobs and were
blacklisted because of a campaign against the idea of communism. This cowardly
act was advanced by Joseph McCarthy and his House
on Un-American Activities Committee. The future President John F. Kennedy
served on that committee.
The United States government carried out holocausts in Korea
and Vietnam. Literally millions of people died because of these wars. This was
also motivated as attempts to stop the spread of communism.
The United States invaded Cuba and threatened the world with
nuclear warfare also, in part, to stop the spread of communism. Today the
United States continues a trade blockade against Cuba in spite of worldwide
condemnation of this blockade.
The New York Times has continued it’s slanders against the
Russian Revolution with two reviews in it’s June 11, 2017 Book Review section.
One of the many problems with the press in any capitalist
country is that they look at the events of the world through the eyes of those
who have power. Rarely do we see media portrayals of the day-to-day lives of
working people and farmers.
We see this tendency clearly in Gregory Feifer’s review of
Sean McMeekin’s book The Russian
Revolution – A New History. Feifer cites an argument by McMeekin about the
state of the Russian economy before the First World War. “Russia’s economy was
surging before the war, with a growth rate of 10 percent a year—like China in
the early 21st century”
Both McMeekin and Feifer ignore the reasons why the Russian
and Chinese economies surged. This was because of low wages and horrendous
working conditions. Today, Chinese workers might work a fourteen-hour day for
ten dollars. Russian workers toiled in factories for eleven-hour days. Both
Chinese and the Russian workers of the past lived in dormitories away from
their families. If McMeekin and Feifer worked under those conditions, I don’t
think they would have a positive outlook on the economy.
Then, Feifer quotes Richard Pipes who also wrote a history of
the Russian Revolution. Pipes argued that the revolution was not a revolution,
but a coup by “identifiable men pursuing their own advantages.”
When we look at the facts of the Russian Revolution, this
statement appears to be totally absurd. We might consider the fact that in
revolutions the ruling powers have most of the advantages. They have an army,
the police, the courts, the press, vast amounts of money, and as we will see,
the government.
Revolutionaries typically have ideas. These ideas can
transform the dissatisfaction of the people into a force capable of replacing
the government with one that has completely different priorities. As the Cuban
revolutionary José Martí once said: “One just principal from the depths of a
cave can be more powerful than an army.”
Then, we have Joshua Rubenstein’s review of Catherine
Merridale’s book, Lenin on the Train about
Vladimir Illyich Lenin’s transport from Switzerland to Russia during the First
World War. Lenin along with many other revolutionaries had been in exile from Russia
because of his political ideas.
In the month of February a revolution broke out in Russia. The
Czar, as well as the royal family, was replaced by a provisional government.
This transition enabled Lenin and other revolutionaries to return to their
homeland.
Rubinstein quotes Merridale about her view of the state of
affairs in Russia after the February revolution. Merridale argues that, “Russia
became the freest country in the world.”
Leon Trotsky was a leader of the Russian Revolution and wrote
a comprehensive three volume History of
the Russian Revolution. Trotsky gave overwhelming evidence that the basic
problems that led to the February Revolution were not being addressed by the
Provisional Government. The one thing that did change was the fact that the
Bolsheviks, led by Lenin, had the opportunity to organize a mass movement to
put a workers government in power.
So, at this point, I will give some facts as to why Russian
workers and farmers organized to place their own government in power. I will
also give a summary as to how that government was betrayed by Joseph
Stalin.
The Russian Revolution
I have worked for a living my entire life as a factory worker
and as a housekeeper. One thing all of my coworkers agree on is that
politicians need to do the work we do every day and live on our wages. This
would give them a completely different perspective towards politics.
So, I will attempt to look at the history of the Russian
Revolution, not from the views of those who had power, but from the
perspectives of the workers and farmers.
Before the Russian Revolution most people who lived on the
vast farmland of Czarist Russia were not farmers but serfs. These serfs were
tied to the land and needed written permission to leave.
In a nation that had some of the most fertile lands in the
world, the Russian serfs lived in perpetual poverty and hunger. The weapon used
to enforce these conditions was the Russian knout.
This was a specially designed whip used to beat, or at times, murder serfs.
Russia was only one of many nations that were ruled by the Czar.
Nations like the Ukraine and Georgia were routinely discriminated against. The
language of those days routinely used abusive epithets to describe individuals
of non-Russian nations.
The Yiddish word pogrom was
invented to describe raids into the Jewish communities. In these pogroms organizations
like the Black Hundreds murdered tens
of thousands of Jews. The Black Hundreds had a similar racist outlook as the Ku
Klux Klan in the United States.
Before the Revolution Czarist Russia was becoming a highly
industrialized nation. While most people continued to live off the land, many
migrated to the cities where they worked eleven-hour days in French financed
factories. These Russian factories were known to have thousands of workers in a
single location.
In the cities, Russian workers learned not to question the
authorities. In the United States there have been protests against police
murders of civilians as well as protests against the police policy of Stop and Frisk. In the cities of Czarist
Russia workers understood that police could routinely beat them and there was
little they could do about it.
Vladimir Illyich Lenin was the central leader of the Bolshevik
party. He was exiled and sent to the frigid climate of Siberia for merely
attending a meeting that was critical of the Czar.
In the year 1905 Russian workers organized to protest against
these conditions. All they wanted to do was to present the Czsar with a list of
their grievances. For this supposed offense, the Russian armed forces murdered
hundreds or thousands of demonstrators.
The Russian workers responded to these assaults by organizing
their Soviets or workers counsels.
These Soviets represented many Russian unions and banned together to protest
victimizations against workers. However, these Soviets only had limited success
before the Russian Revolution. Many of the leaders of Russian workers, like
Lenin, needed to live outside of Russia because of the extreme repression in
their homeland.
Thinking about this history, we might also consider Sean
McKeenin’s view of the czar. “Russia in 1900 was a going concern, its very size
and power a source of pride to most if not all of the czar’s subjects.” So, if
most if not all of the czar’s subjects were proud
of his rule, why was there a revolution that removed this royal family from
power for all time?
The February and October Revolutions
McMeekin argues that the czar made a mistake in going to war
against Germany. This war brought all the problems in Russia to a head and
created the preconditions for revolution.
However, we might consider that at that time Russian industry
was almost entirely owned by French capitalists and Germany was invading
France. We might also consider that if Russia had not gone to war against
Germany, that Germany might have won the First World War. The entire history of
the capitalist world might be different had Germany won the war.
We might also consider that when the Provisional Government
held power, they continued the war the czar started. When the Bolsheviks took
power, they sued Germany for peace, even though this meant giving up large
amounts of land in the Russian west.
The Soviet government and Germany signed the Brest-Litovsk
agreement that ended Russian participation in the First World War. Before those
negotiations, Leon Trotsky invited all the powers that were participating in
the war to join in this peace conference. Trotsky argued that if those powers
refused to participate in those talks, they should explain in clear language
why they were continuing to spill the blood of millions of soldiers in that
senseless war.
Those powers that ordered soldiers to risk their lives in this
war refused to state the real reasons for the war. Those reasons were the same
as the reasons for the Second World War. These wars were about which capitalist
nation would dominate the world. This was why the Bolsheviks had no reason to
sacrifice lives in order to serve the interests of the most affluent families
in the world.
Ken Follett—Fall of the Giants (Book one of
the Century Trilogy)
While I was reading the reviews in the New York Times, I also
was reading Ken Follett’s novel Fall of
the Giants. This is the first volume of his Century Trilogy. These three volumes are an historical fiction of
families in Germany, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States throughout
the twentieth century.
Unlike the histories reviewed in the New York Times, Follett’s
novel attempts to give a compelling story as to why the Russian Revolution
erupted. However, Follett’s narrative has several serious flaws. Throughout
most of these books, Follett looks at the world through the eyes of the
capitalists and their supporters who have power.
In Fall of the Giants, Follett
has a character he named Grigori. Grigori sees his parents murdered in the 1905
Russian Revolution. He then becomes a factory worker who was brutalized by the
police. Grigori then is drafted to fight for Russia in the First World War.
There he experienced routine hunger and a lack of proper boots because the
czar’s army didn’t receive sufficient supplies.
As a soldier Grigori resists fighting the Germans because he
learns that this would be an act of suicide. When a commanding officer attempts
to murder retreating Russian soldiers, Grigori murders that officer. Grigori’s
fellow soldiers had no problem with his actions.
Grigori was sent to St. Petersburg where he was assigned to
protect the royal family. In St. Petersburg he cares for a child who is the son
of his wife. He learns that his wife needed to work all day and then get on a
line at midnight in the frigid cold, just so she might be able to purchase of
loaf of bread in the morning.
Then, we see Grigori finding the child he cares for to be ill.
He discovers that the reason for this illness is that his wife isn’t getting
enough food, and has no milk in her breasts to feed the child. These were
common problems before the February Revolution.
Then, Grigori sees the February Revolution erupt. A commanding
officer ordered Grigori to open fire on demonstrators and Grigori refused.
Among the demonstrators were people he had known throughout his life.
Although Grigori would not fire on the demonstrators, the
racist, sexist, and sadistic police began murdering civilians. Grigori and the
other soldiers began to arm the civilians and opened fire on the police.
Grigori is there when Lenin returns to St. Petersburg. Lenin
understood that the Provisional Government was not going to make any
fundamental changes and proposed that the Soviets take power. Lenin made it
clear that the Soviets were the only force in Russia that would grant the
demands to the people of peace, bread,
and land. These were some of the reasons why the fictional character
Grigori became a Bolshevik. Although Fall
of the Giants is a work of fiction, we can see how Follett’s narrative at
this point closely resembles the reality faced by Russian workers and soldiers.
Understanding this reality we might also consider that Russian
capitalists were reaping huge profits from their war related industries. This
is why Lenin argued that it wasn’t necessary to argue for socialism, but merely
to expose the theft of the state.
Lenin’s return to St. Petersburg
Another character in Follett’s book is named Walter, who works
for the intelligence service of Germany during the First World War. In his
book, Follett has Walter give a significant amount of money to Lenin during his
return to Russia. This idea that Lenin received money from Germany to advance
the Russian revolution is also supported in the reviews in the New York Times.
What are the facts?
First, we can clearly understand why Lenin as well as other
revolutionaries allowed German officials to assist them in returning to their
homeland. The Russian people had endured centuries of the despotic rule of the
czar. The aspirations of the Russian workers and peasants needed to be
supported. If the February Revolution failed to do this, Russia would
experience more years of despotism. For these reasons, revolutionaries accepted
German transport to their homeland.
After the Russian Revolution the officials of the German
government were alive. Had they given money to Lenin, they could have said so.
They made no such statement. Clearly these officials were no supporters of the
Russian Revolution.
In the year 1950 the German archives were opened and there was
no evidence that any money had been given to Lenin.
We might also look at the character of Lenin. On several occasions
Lenin advanced minority points of view and eventually won a majority to his
position. History has shown that almost always Lenin advanced the only course
that was capable of bringing about a successful revolution. Understanding all
these facts, I see no reason to think that Lenin ever received money from
Germany.
Czarist Russia becomes the Union of Soviet
Socialist Republics
In October of 1917 another revolution led by the Bolsheviks
erupted in Russia. This revolution was relatively bloodless. The Provisional
Government had become so discredited that few people rallied to it’s defense.
The Bolsheviks delivered on the demands they advanced.
Although there were shortages of food, bread was distributed equally to the
people and hording was punished as a crime. The Bolsheviks ended Russia’s
participation in the First World War. Peasants were given land they had worked
on their entire lives.
Russia became the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. This
reflected the fact that there were many nations within the old Czarist Russia
that would now have the power to develop their own cultures.
The new government rigorously defended the rights of workers.
Those owners of industries who were used to abusing workers might have their
enterprises confiscated.
As a result, there was a cultural awakening after the
revolution that flowered in the arts and sciences.
However, those who had power in the capitalist world were
horrified by these developments. They had grown accustomed to accumulating vast
quantities of wealth from the labor of workers. Now, there was a workers
government in the largest nation in the world that was dictating the will of
the people to capitalists.
So, fourteen capitalist nations carried out a war attempting to
overthrow the government in the Soviet Union. In this civil war there was a
tremendous loss of life. However, the Bolsheviks managed to organize an army
that defended the nation that had perhaps the longest border in the world.
Stalin betrays the revolution
Here we might consider the fact that with every revolution
there are also counter-revolutionary movements. Those people who had been
removed from power use whatever influence they have to regain political
control.
In the United States there was the Civil War. This war removed
slave owners from their positions of power in this country. Because of the
Civil War the United States government adopted the 13th, 14th,
and 15th Amendments to the Constitution. These Amendments outlawed
slavery and gave former slaves full rights in this country. All men received
voting rights.
However, by the year 1877 the federal government made a deal
where it removed the Union Army from the former Confederate states. This deal
enabled those who were hostile to the interests of former slaves to mobilize.
Organizations like the Ku Klux Klan went to war and put in place governments
that stripped Black people of their citizenship rights. Thousands of Black
people were lynched and the federal government did nothing to prosecute the
murderers. It wasn’t until the mid 1960s that the Civil Rights Movement forced
the government to return many of the rights that had been taken away.
We might consider that after the Civil War in the Soviet
Union, the economy of the nation had been almost completely destroyed.
Transporting food from one location to another became a challenge. The nation
had lost millions of people due to the First World War and the Civil War.
Under these conditions Joseph Stalin, who was a Bolshevik,
worked to betray everything the revolution fought for. Stalin recruited many
individuals from the former middle class. He allowed these people to maintain
their relative privileges as members of the Communist Party. He then worked to
place the entire leadership of the Russian Revolution on show trials where most
would be sentenced to death.
The Soviet Communist Party was in the leadership of an
international movement. Under the leadership of Lenin, this movement supported
the interests of workers all over the world.
Stalin reversed the political orientation of this movement.
Time after time Stalin betrayed the interests of workers in the world, in order
to advance his personal relationship with capitalist governments. This tendency
was best illustrated when Stalin made a pact with Nazi Germany.
Today, the present Russian head of state is Vladimir Putin.
Putin is openly critical of the policies of Lenin. Putin has amassed a fortune
and he might be one of several billionaires in Russia. However, the standard of
living for Russian workers is deteriorating. This state of affairs is merely a
continuation of the betrayal of the Russian Revolution by Joseph Stalin.
Conclusion
We might consider that the union movement in the United States
flowered after the Russian Revolution. Capitalists learned that they could
loose everything if a workers government took power. This was a compelling
reason to recognize unions and grant many of their demands.
Workers began to understand that employers were not all
powerful. If employers failed to negotiate with workers, they could be forced
out of power and replaced with a workers government.
Working people learned of Lenin’s pamphlet Imperialism—the highest stage of capitalism.
This pamphlet explains how the economic and political domination of nations
is not because of mistakes or insensitivity. No the mass poverty in the world
is the inevitable result of the normal functioning of the capitalist system.
The First and Second World Wars were not wars for democracy. No, these wars were about
what capitalist nation would dominate the world. The effect of these wars has
been that today about one billion people in the world don’t have enough food,
lack access to electricity, and running water, and are denied education, and
health care.
Working people also learned that the only way for all workers
to advance is to fight against all forms of discrimination. The
institutionalized discrimination in the United States against Black people,
women, Native Americans, and immigrants needs to be challenged by workers. This
is the only way for working people to achieve the unity necessary to put in
place a government where human needs are more important than profits.
We also learned that workers and farmers need a political
party that works consistently to advance the interests of workers throughout
the world. This organization can fight for concessions from capitalists, but it
must also strive to put in place a government that represents the interests of
workers and farmers.
The Russian Revolution also inspired Cuban revolutionaries. In
spite the Stalinist betrayals, the Soviet Union gave significant aid to
revolutionary Cuba. The Soviet Union also gave military aid to Cuba and Angola
when the apartheid government of South Africa invaded Angola in an attempt to
place their own government in charge of that country.
-->
Understanding this history, we can begin to truly appreciate
those who put in place the first workers government in the world. They managed
to overcome the seemingly overwhelming obstacles that confront workers
throughout the world. Then, for a time, they showed the world that it is
possible to have a government where human needs are more important than
profits.