Recently,
I attended the national march on Washington.
The march commemorated the fifty-year anniversary of the march for civil
rights where Martin Luther King Jr. gave his “I Have a Dream” speech. While participants in the march raised many
issues, the most noticeable were: justice for Trayvon Martin, support for
voting rights, and the demand for jobs.
I
have seen numerous articles and documentaries that looked back at the 1963
March. None of these stories mention
what Malcolm X had to say about the March.
While Malcolm was an uncompromising supporter of Black rights, he didn’t
like the March. He argued that when the
White House discovered that they could not prevent the march, they did their
best to control it.
The 1963 March
The
purpose of the 1963 March was to pressure the government to pass civil rights
legislation. Malcolm was familiar with
the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the Constitution. These Amendments stated clearly that everyone
in this country is supposed to have full rights, including voting rights. The Fourteenth Amendment states that any
state that denies people the right to vote will loose proportional
representation in congress. In a recent
Supreme Court decision, we see how this court still refuses to recognize the
Constitution.
In
other words, from a legal perspective, the laws protecting the rights of Black
people had been written in the 19th century. The reason for the 1963 March on Washington
was to pressure the government to enact laws that had already been written into
the Constitution.
In
fact, President Kennedy refused to defend the Freedom Riders who rode on buses
where Black people sat in the front and Caucasians sat in the back. Kennedy was the Commander and Chief of the
most powerful army in the world, yet he made no effort to arrest the racist
thugs who viciously beat these peaceful protesters. To the contrary, Kennedy sat back and allowed
the Freedom Riders to be taken to jail.
Malcolm
also argued that President Kennedy chose six Black leaders to organize the
March. Protesters were told not to bring
signs, and only to sing the song “We Shall Overcome.” Malcolm felt that this song was clear
evidence that the government did not represent the people. He especially didn’t like the fact that the
words to this song were, “We shall overcome some
day.”
John
Lewis was a leader of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee and he had
prepared an uncompromising speech to be given at the 1963 March. A. Phillip Randolph pressured Lewis to alter
his speech to make it more acceptable to the conservative forces who supported
the March.
In
the years after the 1963 March, the government passed the Equal Rights Act as
well as the Voting Rights Act. These
laws were mere redundancies of the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the
Constitution. However, it was still up
to the government to enforce these laws.
Cities across the United States erupt in insurrection
In
cities throughout the nation Black people began to understand that nothing
significant was changing with respect to police brutality, as well as
institutionalized discrimination in housing, education, and employment. These conditions sparked rebellions in cities
throughout the nation.
Corporate
officers and their supporters in the government began to understand that these
uprisings were bad for business. I
believe we can say that these rebellions also played a role in convincing those
who had power that Black people needed to be given opportunities they never had
before.
However,
Michelle Alexander documented something that began to happen at the same time
as these opportunities opened up. In her
book, The New Jim Crow - Mass
Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness, she documents how citizens of
the United States have a better chance of going to prison than citizens of any
other nation in the would. Black people
are grossly over-represented in this horrendous system of incarceration.
Cities erupt across Southern Vietnam
While
the cities in the U.S. were erupting and the National Guard was used to
suppress these uprisings, the armed forces were also being used in a war
against the people of Vietnam. Malcolm X
supported the Vietnamese in this conflict and gave them credit for their heroic
liberation struggle. Martin Luther King
was also against the war and argued that the U.S. armed forces might appear to
be “strange liberators” to the Vietnamese.
King also argued that the United States government was the “greatest
purveyor of violence in the world.
General
Westmoreland was the commanding officer for the U.S. troops in Vietnam. Westmoreland argued in 1967 that the U.S.
forces were winning the war. The
Vietnamese responded to this absurd statement by launching the Tet Offensive
and attacked the U.S. forces in the cities and towns throughout southern
Vietnam.
Mohammed
Ali was the Heavyweight Champion of the world at that time. Ali had been influenced by Malcolm X, and
refused to be drafted into the military.
Ali argued that: “No Vietnamese ever called me nigger.”
The 2013 March on Washington
In
the recent March on Washington, demonstrators brought their own signs. However, the freedom of movement was more
tightly restricted than in the 1963 March.
When we look at photos of the 1963 March, we see there were no
fences. In the recent March, there were
fences everywhere and the movement of the demonstrators was also severely
restricted by police officers carrying guns.
Another
similarity to the 1963 March was the support it received from the White
House. After the 1963 March President
Kennedy invited the six appointed organizers to the White House and informed
them they had done a “good job.”
President Obama gave a speech four days after the demonstration at the
Lincoln Memorial where he attempted to show how he supported the same ideals as
Martin Luther King.
The myth that Obama supports the ideals of King
In
order for President Obama to make this absurd argument he needed to completely
leave out of his speech everything he has done for the past five years. He applauded the non-violence of the
demonstrators in 1963. Yet, during every
day of his Presidency he has been supporting a war costing thousands of lives
and hundreds of billions of dollars against the people of Afghanistan. Afghanistan happens to be one of the poorest
nations in the world.
At
the same time as he applauded nonviolence, he was planning a bombing campaign
against the people of Syria. The
so-called pretext for this attack is that Syrian President Assad apparently
used chemical weapons against the people of that country. In fact, the U.S. government has a long
history of supporting ruthless dictatorships throughout the world.
Obama
talked about how he found the system of Jim Crow segregation to be reprehensible. Jim Crow was a system of legalized
discrimination. Today, President Obama
has a vicious policy of legally discriminating against immigrant workers.
We
might consider that Martin Luther King wrote a letter while the government in
Birmingham, Alabama held him in jail. At
the time, there were some religious officials who argued that King should be
“patient,” and that change with respect to segregation would come in time.
King
responded that his daughter once asked him why she could not play in a local
park. King told his daughter that she
couldn’t play in that park because she was Black. King didn’t like that answer and explained
that this was the reason why he would not patiently wait for change to happen.
President
Obama has deported over one million immigrants from this country. Thousands of these immigrants are parents of
children who were born here. The
Immigration and Naturalization Service deported these parents and sent the
children to foster homes. Yet, President
Obama argues that he shares Dr. King’s dream.
Obama
acknowledged that the unemployment rate is higher today than it was in
1963. He also spoke of the unfairness of
the disparity between those who are struggling to survive, and the billionaires
who have more money than they could ever use.
Obama didn’t mention that he supported giving banks literally trillions of dollars in his so-called
“bailout plan.” While the banks and the
billionaires have been bailed out, the unemployment rate has not changed in the
years since he’s been President.
Hundreds of thousands of dollars per person
While
I was one of the more than 100,000 people who came to Washington to
demonstrate, I was thinking of a very basic idea. Anyone who has a relatively modest salary of
$30,000 per year will pay about $10,000 in taxes. This means that in a thirty-year period this
person will pay $300,000 in taxes. The
penalty for not paying these taxes might be a term in prison. In other words, each one of the 100,000
demonstrators will be required to pay at
least hundreds of thousands of dollars in taxes.
We
might also argue that employers do not hire workers because they are
kind-hearted. No, the basic idea is that
corporations hire workers in order to maximize their profits. In other words, every working person
generates enormous amounts of wealth and receives relatively little in return.
I
believe that the 100,000 marchers might agree on the idea that we would all
like to be treated with respect. At our
jobs employers demand that we do what they say.
Advertisers attempt to sell us items all day long, just so they might
get our money. This column documents how
politicians pretend to support our interests, while allowing corporations to
maximize profits. Yes, we would like the
people who hold power to be honest with us and to give us the respect we
deserve. This is just an example of
common decency.
The Cuban example
It
seems like every other day the press has something negative to say about the
island of Cuba. One accusation the press
never makes about the Cuban government is the idea that they are
dishonest. No, in the many long speeches
Cuban leaders make to the people that haven’t been caught in a lie.
When
the Cuban government says that education and health care are their priorities,
this is no ploy to win votes. Cuba has
more doctors and teachers per capita than any other nation in the world. While Cuba was once a sugar producing country
that was a playground for the affluent, today people come from all over the
world for Cuban health care and education.
I
believe that this is because the Cuban Government has a basic respect for the
people.
Conclusion
Martin
Robinson Delany was an abolitionist and a nationalist who lived at the time of
the Civil War. Delany made the following
comment that not only is relevant today, but I feel this comment cuts through
much of the nonsense the media promotes today.
“A
people, to be free, must necessarily be their
own rulers: that is, each individual must,
in himself, embody the essential ingredient--so
to speak--of the sovereign principle which
composes the true basis of his
liberty.”
Malcolm
X also had these words of wisdom taken from an interview with the Village Voice.
“The
greatest mistake of the movement,” he said, “has been trying to organize a
sleeping people around specific goals.
You have to wake the people up first”. . .
Wake
them up to their exploitation?
“No,
to their humanity, to their worth, and to their heritage”
I
believe that the recent March on Washington is clear evidence that the people
are beginning to wake up.
No comments:
Post a Comment