By Tom Hayden
Published with The New York Review of Books, Vintage Books,
a division of Random House, 1967
A review
Recently,
we have seen uprisings in Baltimore, Maryland, Ferguson, Missouri, and several
other cities where Black men had been murdered by the police. Only after the rebellion in Baltimore did a
State Prosecutor issue indictments against six police officers involved in the
murder of Freddie Gray.
Tom
Hayden’s 1967, book Rebellion in Newark –
Official violence and ghetto response demonstrates that both rebellions and
police violence are nothing new in this country. While this book continues to be well worth
reading, in my opinion, there was one significant weakness. Hayden’s book failed to place the rebellion
in Newark in a historical context. This
review will attempt to correct that flaw.
The history of racist violence
An
undeniable fact about the history of the United States is that thousands of
Black people died as a result of lynchings.
Many if not most of these lynchings took place in rural areas in the
south. The film Rosewood documented how racists destroyed an entire Black community
in 1923. A similar event happened in
Tulsa, Oklahoma in 1921. Rarely, if
ever, did the government of this country make any attempt to prosecute those
who organized these lynchings.
Racist
violence wasn’t limited to the United States.
Before the Second World War most Jewish people lived in Eastern
Europe. At that time there were a series
of racist raids on Jewish communities where thousands lost their lives. Jews used the Yiddish word pogrom to describe these racist
attacks. The Tsarist government of
Russia had no problem with these pogroms and even encouraged the murderers.
One
of the definitions of the word pogrom is:
A massacre or persecution instigated by
the government or by the ruling class against a minority group, particularly
Jews.
However,
when many Jews and other Europeans came to this country, something happened. The writer James Baldwin argued that there was
a price to be paid by Caucasians who came to this country. He called this the Price of the Ticket. This
meant that many Caucasians forgot their experiences in Europe and viewed
themselves as white.
Becoming
white meant they needed to forget some of the horrors of Europe so they could
feel some sense of entitlement. This
so-called entitlement was about the illusion of an expectation of being treated
better because they were not Black.
The
civil rights movement erupted because Black people had been systematically
denied citizenship rights in this country partly because of the Jim Crow
laws. In 1963 Martin Luther King was
arrested in Birmingham, Alabama. At that
time, there were religious officials who criticized King for being
arrested. They argued that he needed to
be patient and that change would come eventually.
King
responded to this argument with his Letter
from a Birmingham Jail. He wrote
that his daughter asked King why she wasn’t allowed to play in a local
park. King didn’t like the fact that he
had to tell his daughter that she wasn’t allowed to play in the park because of
the color of her skin. This was one
reason why Martin Luther King decided he wasn’t going to be patient and took
direct action.
Malcolm
X lived most of his life in cities in the northern states that didn’t have Jim
Crow laws. Malcolm argued that it wasn’t
sufficient to argue for civil rights. He
argued that the government routinely denied Black people human rights throughout
this country. For this reason Malcolm
argued that the United States government needed to be put on trial in the World
Court for its human rights violations against millions of Blacks living in this
country.
The Newark rebellion
The
rebellion in Newark, as rebellions in many other cities, started with an
incident of police brutality. The police
arrested a cab driver by the name of John Smith on July 12, 1967. One of the charges against Smith was that he
used “abusive language.” This is what Smith
had to say about his time in police custody:
“There
was no resistance on my part. That was a
cover story by the police. They caved in
my ribs, busted a hernia, and put a hole in my head.”
The
rebellion in Newark wasn’t about protesting this single incident. In January of 1967 business officials issued
a report where they argued that Newark’s problems were “more grave and pressing
than those of perhaps any other American city.”
City officials applied for funds under the Model Cities Act using the following
argument:
“Newark had the nation’s highest percentage
of bad housing, the most crime per 100,000 people, the heaviest tax burden, the
highest rates of venereal disease, maternal mortality, and new cases of
tuberculosis. The city was listed as second
in infant mortality, second in birth rate, seventh in absolute number of drug
addicts. Its unemployment rate in the
Black community was 15%.”
We
might also think about the fact that rebellions had been erupting in Black
communities all over the nation four years before 1967. Some people were surprised, not that the
rebellion happened in Newark, but that it didn’t erupt before 1967.
After
John Smith’s arrest civil rights leaders demanded to see him. After some resistance from the police, these
leaders saw John Smith and demanded that he receive medical attention. Smith was taken to Beth Israel Hospital.
John
Smith had initially been taken to the Forth Precinct Police Station located on
17th avenue near what was then Belmont Avenue. Today, the former Belmont Avenue is called
Irving Turner Boulevard.
Across
the street from the Forth Precinct were the former Hayes Homes housing
projects. Tom Hayden reported that the
Hayes Homes consisted of six buildings each housing about 1,000 people on twelve
floors.
Cab
drivers throughout the city had been communicating to one another about the
brutality John Smith experienced. A
demonstration took place at the Fourth Precinct that evening. The anger of the 500 demonstrators turned
into rage and missiles started flying at the police station. These missiles would break 110 windows.
The
police came out of the station with helmets and clubs. They were met with a torrent of bricks and
bottles. Afraid for their lives, the
police retreated back into the station.
Tom
Hayden gives this useful description of the thinking of Black people who
participated in the rebellion:
“Fathers
and mothers in the ghetto often complain that even they cannot understand the
wildness of their kids. Knowing that
America denies opportunity to black young men, black parents still share with
whites the sense that youth is heading in a radically new, incomprehensible,
and frightening direction. Refusal to
obey authority—that of the parents, teachers and other adult ‘supervisors’—is a
common charge against youngsters. Yet
when the riot broke out, the generations came together. The parents understood and approved the
defiance of their sons that night.”
The
so-called “looting” of white owned stores started that evening.
James
Baldwin spoke about the so-called “looting” that took place in the Black
community during the rebellions. He
argued that when a young Black man takes a television from a store, he doesn’t
really want that TV. Baldwin argued that
what that young Black man wants is for people to recognize that he exists and
is in fact a human being.
We
might also consider that the United States became a nation as a result of a
political revolution. The Declaration of
Independence states clearly that when the people are subjected to a “long train
of abuses” it is not only, “their right, but their duty” to throw off their
oppressors and establish new guards for their security.
At
the Boston Tea Party of 1773, insurgents boarded three ships in Boston
Harbor. It took them three hours to
throw 342 chests of tea overboard.
The
so-called “looting” of white owned stores was partly about the routine cheating
these storeowners practiced in the Black community. Well-dressed working people participated in
the rebellion and felt entitled to get even for all the money these stores effectively
stole from the community. The insurgents
left the Black owned stores alone.
While
the Black community felt a sense of empowerment from the rebellion, the police
took a different approach. On Thursday,
July 13, 250 people were treated at City Hospital. At least fifteen had gunshot wounds. The next morning there were 425 people in
jail.
However,
the brutal police response was incapable of stopping the rebellion. Newark Mayor Hugh Addonizio asked Governor
Richard J. Hughes for assistance.
Governor Hughes mobilized over 3,000 National Guardsmen to carry out,
what was in effect, a pogrom against the Black residents of Newark.
Governor
Hughes toured Newark on Friday morning July 15.
He called the uprising, “An obvious open rebellion.” This description by Hughes differed
descriptions by the press and the history books that have routinely called the
Newark rebellions “riots.” Hughes was
open about his hatred for the tax-paying residents of Newark with his
statement:
“The
line between the jungle and the law might as well be drawn here as any place in
America.”
A
Committee of Concern that included the Episcopal Bishop, deans of Rutgers
Newark campus as well as their law school, and the vice-presidents of
Prudential Insurance Company disagreed with Governor Hughes statement. They issued a statement arguing that a major
cause of the rebellion was a belief held in the Black community that the police
are, “the single continuously lawless element operating in the community.”
During
the government-organized pogrom about 24 people lost their lives. This number may be higher given that the
hospitals were overwhelmed with residents who had been injured or murdered.
Friday
evening July 15 was the time of most of the murders. Among those who lost their lives was
Detective Fred Toto and Fire Captain Michael Moran. Tom Hayden reported that in all probability
these men died as a result of gunfire coming from the police or national
guardsmen. Also on Friday evening ten
Black people were killed, 100 suffered gunshot wounds, 500 were “treated” at
City Hospital, and as many were arrested or held.
One
clear example of vandalism was the police organized destruction of Black owned
stores. As I mentioned before, those who
participated in the rebellion didn’t damage any of the stores owned by Black
people. Those stores were marked “soul
brother.” Witnesses observed police
destruction of 100 stores that had been marked soul brother.
Tom
Hayden quoted a statement made by lawyers that included members of the American
Civil Liberties Union. They argued that
the police were an instrument of a conspiracy, “to engage in a pattern of
systematic violence, terror, abuse, intimidation, and humiliation. They went on to say the police “seized on the
initial disorders as an opportunity and pretext to perpetuate the most
horrendous and widespread killing, violence, torture, and intimidation, not in
response to any crime or civilian disorder, but in a violent demonstration of powerlessness
of the plaintiffs and their class.
. .”
In
1967 I happened to be fourteen years old and living in a section of the South
Ward in Newark known as Weekquahic. All
I knew about the rebellions were the National Guardsmen stationed at the end of
the street where I lived. I also
remember stories of how there were snipers who were firing at the guardsmen
from rooftops. In Hayden’s book I don’t
recall anyone being convicted of being a sniper.
There
were however three young people who died in the rebellion. If I had a different skin color and lived a
few miles from where I was living at the time, I could have been one of those
young people.
One
was ten-year old Eddie Moss of 240 Rose Street.
Eddie was sitting in his family car on the way to a White Castle for
dinner. Guardsmen shot at the car and
Eddie lost his life.
Another
was twelve-year old Michael Pugh of 340 Fifteenth Avenue. Michael’s mother sent him to take out the
garbage. Guardsmen apparently heard
someone say something derogatory. They
shot Michael Pugh dead.
Another
was sixteen-year old James Sanders of 52 Beacon Street. Police records indicate that James lost his
life because of gunshot wounds. The
circumstances of his death are uncertain.
However, his father said he had never been in trouble before.
Governor
Hughes dismissed the charges of police and National Guard brutality arguing
that this was, “standard operating procedure.”
He went on to state that he was “thrilled” by the performance of the
troops.
The war against Vietnam
We
might also consider that while the National Guardsmen invaded Newark, the U.S.
military was at war against the people of Vietnam. Le Ly Hayslip wrote her book titled, When Heaven and Earth Changed Places that
describes what the war meant to her family.
Her book was made into a film titled Heaven
and Earth.
The
story of Le Ly Hayslip's family shows concretely what this war was all
about. Ms Hayslip's oldest brother, Bon
Nghe spent most of his adult life in the army that forced the U.S. out of his
homeland. Another brother, Sou Bon was
reported to have been blown up by a land mine that was made in the U.S.A. The death of this brother was never confirmed
and to this day Sou Bon is what the newspapers refer to as "Missing In
Action". Because of the war a
sister of Ms Hayslip (Lan) was forced off the family's farm and became a
prostitute in order to survive. Both Ms
Hayslip and her mother were also forced off their land and experienced
homelessness as a result.
Ms
Hayslip was held in prison and tortured on three separate occasions. Ms Hayslip's father, Phung Trong remained on
his farm that was located in the middle of a war zone. The separation of the father from his wife
and six children, the fact that he was tortured in prison by the U.S. and its
allies, and the fact that he had to endure the complete destruction of his way
of life provoked Phung Trong to commit suicide.
In
all, millions of people lost their lives in the U.S. war against the people of
Southeast Asia. While these stories are
unimaginably horrendous, the Vietnamese people eventually forced the U.S.
military out of their country.
The aftermath of the rebellions
Tom
Hayden argued that the National Guardsmen left Newark just a few days after
they arrived. We might appreciate that
there was seething hatred of the guardsmen by the people of in the city. The government that gave orders to the
guardsmen apparently were concerned about what might happen if this anger was
mobilized.
Martin
Luther King visited the Los Angeles neighborhood of Watts after the rebellion
in 1965. King asked the question: “What
did it profit the Negro to burn down the stores and factories in which he
sought employment?”
Clearly,
there was considerable destruction that took place during the rebellions. I went to Arts High in the Central Ward of
Newark. Every day on the bus ride to
school I saw block after block of burned out stores that hadn’t been torn down.
However,
we might speculate that those who have power in this country understood that
when cities erupt in rebellion, that this is bad for business. We might also speculate that that this
awareness prompted business and government officials to promote affirmative
action programs in education and employment.
When
I attended the 40th high school reunion of my graduating class, I
learned that many of my former classmates had educational and employment
opportunities their parents never had.
Most of my former classmates are Black.
Martin Luther King didn’t live to see this development.
We
must also state that today the government has targeted Black people for
prison. The numbers of Black people in
prison is grossly out of proportion to their percentage of the population. Anyone living in this country has a better
chance of going to prison than citizens of any other nation in the world. Understanding these facts, my opinion is that
we need to stop calling the prisons of this country, prisons.
A
better description would be to call these institutions concentration camps.
So,
what can we learn from the rebellions that have erupted all over this country? My opinion is that we first need to think
about the worlds in the Declaration of Independence. That declaration argued that people don’t
normally take up arms against a government.
But when there is a “long train of abuses,” it is not only “their right,
but their duty,” to throw off the old regime and establish new guards for their
security.
The
rebellions demonstrate clearly that the people of this country are not
apathetic. When we are pushed to the
point where they need to respond, we have responded. The problem has been that we need an
organized leadership that can transform the justifiable rage people feel into
action that can make a profound difference.
This
did happen in the nation of Cuba. A
nation that experienced routine police brutality and extreme poverty, was
transformed into a nation that leads the world in health care and
education. While Cuba continues to have
pressing problems, their example is inspiring for all those seeing human
dignity for everyone in the world.
No comments:
Post a Comment