I’ve
always found Presidential debates to be difficult to witness. Those individuals in the Democratic or
Republican Parties appear to live in a completely different world from working
people in this country. They profess to
care about people and argue that they are working in our best interests.
Colin
Kaepernick, the San Francisco quarterback who has refused to stand during the
playing of the national anthem had this to say about the so-called presidential
debate. “Both are proven liars and it
almost seems like they’re trying to debate who’s less racist.”
So a
question to be asked is: Why is there such a disconnect between what government
officials say, and the actual reality working people experience every day?
Both
Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton asked the audience to fact-check their
arguments. Well, we can begin our fact
checking by taking a look at the science of basic arithmetic.
When
we pay for any commodity the money usually goes to private enterprises or
corporations. Some of that money goes to the owners and some goes to the
workers who produce all goods and services.
When the owners get more in terms of profits, workers get less. When workers get more in terms of wages,
owners get less in terms of profits.
This is basic arithmetic.
Looking
at this relationship, we see that the interests of workers and owners are
antagonistic. The press argues against
this perspective. They routinely argue
that when workers receive higher wages, employers simply raise prices. This is not true.
Prices
are set because of the system of supply and demand. If corporations set their prices too high,
people will not purchase commodities and corporations will go out of
business. We see this with respect to
the price of gasoline. Gasoline used to
be about four dollars per gallon, and now it is about two dollars per
gallon. Corporations lowered the price
because they felt they would loose money if gasoline remained at a price of
four dollars per gallon.
So,
we can conclude that the interests of workers and employers are
antagonistic. A fundamental problem with
the Clinton and Trump campaigns is they argue that the interests of
corporations and workers are the same.
By doing this, they are both clearly taking the side of corporations
against workers.
Donald
Trump has most of his business interests in this country. He favors placing onerous taxes on
commodities imported into this country.
In economic terms, this is called protectionism.
Protectionist
policies favor weaker capitalist economies.
By placing taxes on imports, domestic industries are in a more favorable
position to compete.
When
Britain and France were the world powers in the nineteenth century, the United
States had protectionist laws to encourage investment in domestic
industries. During those years, the
prices of commodities were more expensive than in other countries because of
these measures.
Then,
after the Second World War, the United States became the world’s
superpower. The protectionist measures
were abandoned. U.S. corporations could
undercut the prices of corporations in other countries, and placing onerous
taxes on corporations during those years was counterproductive.
However,
something else happened after the Second World War. In the first part of the twentieth century,
working people commonly toiled for twelve to fourteen hours per day. The wages of those times were barely enough
to feed a family. Children routinely
worked in factories.
So
the labor movement organized and forced corporations to make significant
concessions. The civil rights movement
also organized to give Black people rights they had been denied. The women’s movement also organized to make
real gains for women.
Corporations
responded to these developments by making massive investments into
manufacturing facilities where workers receive a salary of between one and ten
dollars per day. This was not done just
because capitalists are greedy as some people argue. No, a constant feature of the capitalist
system is that corporations are routinely driven to cut costs.
One
of the reasons why many capitalists favor Hillary Clinton is because her
policies favor their investments in other countries. So, this is the choice. Trump’s policies might favor more U.S. jobs
with higher prices. Clinton’s approach
might favor fewer jobs with lower prices.
Working people loose with both strategies.
We
should also keep in mind that the banks nearly closed down in the year
2008. These banks were saved by
literally trillions of dollars in
government assistance known as quantitative
easing. The government bought up
nearly worthless investments to rescue the banks. This crisis can not be averted and it is only
a matter of time before the capitalist debt-bubble will break.
What do working people want?
Since
the interests of workers and capitalists are antagonistic, we might ask the
question: What do workers and farmers want?
I
will only give my opinion on this question based on my life’s experience. There are eight basic things that workers
want. These include: food, clothing,
housing, transportation, communication, health care, education, and exposure to
cultural activities like art, music, sports, recreation, dancing, theater, and
film.
The
incomparable singer Etta James also said in one of her songs that she wanted
“security.” For me, this means that we
need to have the right to all those things workers want and need throughout our
lifetimes. Of course, all these goods
and services need to be of the highest quality.
Capitalists
want us to be competitive. They want us
to think that workers who live in other cities, or states, or countries are our
competitors. My opinion is that working
people have the same interests in all countries. We all would like the things I just mentioned.
Politicians
as well as the media argue that it is unrealistic to have these goals. They argue that the way to get what we want
is to work for a corporation directly or through a small business. The idea of working people running a
government where human needs are more important than profits is totally
unacceptable to those who support the capitalist system.
However,
when we think about the goods and services people want and need, we might
question the role of some of the enterprises we’re routinely exposed to. The cities throughout the world are filled
with office buildings that house enterprises that include: banking, insurance,
advertising, as well as stock brokerage houses.
Thinking about what these enterprises do, they don’t directly provide
for the goods and services we want and need.
Yet, we need to pay for all these enterprises with every commodity we
buy.
Both
Trump and Clinton argue that they have plans that will reinvigorate the
economy. However, there is no real plan
in the capitalist system. Capitalism is
continually regulated by the anarchy of supply and demand.
In
1929 there were more commodities on the market than could be sold at a profit,
so capitalists merely shut down the economy.
Millions lost their savings.
Working people experienced pay cuts and there was about thirty percent
unemployment. This same scenario almost
happened in 2008. Clearly, there was no
plan for these events.
Donald
Trump totally discredited Hillary Clinton’s claim that working people benefitted
from policies she advocated with the following statement:
“You
go to New England, you go to Ohio, Pennsylvania, you go anywhere you want,
Secretary Clinton, and you will see devastation where manufacture is down 30,
40, sometimes 50 percent.”
However,
Trump also totally discredited his character when he argued that he favors “law
and order.” Had there been a real
debate, this statement would have destroyed any popularity Trump has.
The Central Park Five
In the year 1989 a young woman was raped and
brutalized in Central Park, New York.
The police arrested five Black teenagers for the crime and coerced them
into signing confessions. There was no
other evidence connecting the Central Park Five to this crime.
Donald
Trump paid $85,000 for adds in four New York City newspapers. The headlines of these ads were: “Bring Back
the Death Penalty.” Theses ads, signed
by Trump argued:
“I
want to hate these muggers and murderers.
They should be made to suffer.”
‘They should serve as examples so others will think long and hard before
committing a crime or an act of violence.”
After
serving seven years in prison, conclusive evidence emerged that someone else
was guilty of this crime. All of the
Central Park Five were released from prison.
The city of New York eventually paid each of the Central Park Five one
million dollars for every year they spent in prison.
Donald
Trump argued that this settlement was a “disgrace.” He went on to say that, “The recipients must
be laughing out loud at the stupidity of the city.”
So,
Donald Trump argued that young Black teenagers, who were found not guilty of
anything should be made to “suffer.”
When it was conclusively proven that they were innocent of the crime
they had been convicted of, he offers no apology. To the contrary, he calls the payment they
received for being unjustly incarcerated, to be a “disgrace.”
I
read the newspapers every day. Rarely
have I seen any mention of Donald Trump and the Central Park Five. Yet he is in the papers every day.
Hillary
Clinton chose not to call Trump in this gross hypocrisy. Clinton supported her husband, President
William Clinton’s “Crime Bill.” The
effect of this bill was to dramatically increase the number of people living in
prisons in this country. Anyone who
lives in the USA has a better chance of going to prison than citizens in any
other nation in the world.
I’m
supporting Allyson Kennedy for President and Osborne Hart for
vice-President. They are the candidates
of the Socialist Workers Party. They
understand that the interests of workers are antagonistic to the interests of
corporations. They understand that only
by mobilizing working people will any basic changes happen. They see the interests of working people
throughout the world as the same and see our interests as being
international. They believe that it is
clearly possible for working people to establish a government where human needs
are seen as more important than corporate profits.
While
they will not win the election, this strategy has the potential to transform
the world.
No comments:
Post a Comment