By Steve Halpern
Last
evening I attended a protest of a so-called community meeting billed as
information about a cleanup of a Philadelphia Energy Solutions refinery. In
order to explain this protest, some background information is useful.
The explosion at the Philadelphia Energy Solutions refinery
Several
months ago there was an explosion at the largest oil refinery on the east coast,
that is owned by the Philadelphia Energy Solutions Corporation. Four workers
were injured because of the explosion. The explosion had so much force, that a
twenty-ton piece of shrapnel flew over the Schuylkill River. The pipe that
contained a potentially lethal chemical had deteriorated to the point that it
was paper-thin.
This
refinery used to be owned by the Sonoco Corporation. A large stockholder of
Sonoco used to be the Pew family that now runs the Pew Charitable Trust.
The
explosion released close to two tons of hydrogen fluoride. This is an extremely
dangerous material. According to the Philadelphia Inquirer, if 2.5% of a
person’s body is exposed to hydrogen fluoride, this can be fatal. To treat an
exposure of hydrogen fluoride, a person needs to be injected with calcium
chloride. As we might imagine, few people in Philadelphia know about this
reality.
One
of the workers at the refinery moved the hydrogen fluoride to a safer location
within two minutes of the explosion. The Inquirer reported that if this measure
had not been taken, hundreds of thousands of people living in the Delaware
Valley would have been exposed to this potentially lethal substance.
Since
the explosion, Philadelphia Energy Solutions has closed the refinery and laid
off about 600 workers. The Inquirer has reported that the ground underneath the
refinery has been polluted with dangerous chemicals. Those chemicals have the
potential of polluting the Delaware Valley aquifer that supplies water to
millions of residents in Pennsylvania and New Jersey.
The protest and the meeting in Point Breeze
The
protest of this meeting was organized by the community organization Philly
Thrive. Many people became active in this organization because of the increased
numbers of deaths due to respiratory illnesses and cancer in the surrounding Point
Breeze neighborhood. Several leaders of Philly Thrive spoke about their
personal experiences with relatives who had cancer or respiratory illnesses.
So,
why did Philly Thrive organize a protest of a so-called community meeting
billed as an educational about the cleanup of the refinery?
About
one month ago, I attended another so-called community meeting billed as an
educational to inform people about the future of the land where the refinery is
located. On the panel of that meeting were representatives of the Chamber of
Commerce, the University of Pennsylvania, and the union that represents workers
at the refinery.
I
listened to speaker after speaker at this meeting for about ninety minutes.
During that time, no one spoke about the explosion at the refinery, the workers
who had been injured, or the adults and children who have suffered from
respiratory illnesses or cancer. The primary topic of discussion at this
meeting was how to use the land where the refinery is located in order to
create profits for a corporation.
I
found that discussion insulting to the people who live in Philadelphia, given
the seriousness of the problems caused by the owners of the refinery. This
refinery was the biggest polluter in the city. People might have died or
suffered because of the pollution emitted by that refinery. Yet, all the
organizers of that so-called “community meeting” could talk about was, how to
generate profits for the very corporation that created this crisis.
So,
when I arrived at this meeting held at a public school, Philly Thrive members
encouraged people to join with them in holding placards protesting this
so-called community meeting. These members told us that they made several
attempts to meet with city officials in order to ensure that the land that had
been used for this refinery will be made safe for the residents of this area.
They were met with a wall of indifference.
Initially
we blocked an entrance to the auditorium where this event was supposed to be
held. Then, after about an hour the organizers of the meeting began their
presentation. At this point, we entered the auditorium and discovered that the
protesters greatly outnumbered those who were attending the meeting.
One
of our leaders then took the microphone and gave a statement explaining why we
were taking this action. Then, she invited anyone who wished to speak to take
the microphone. At this time we listened to many speakers who gave us a
detailed analysis of the effects this refinery has had on the Point Breeze
neighborhood.
After
we made our presentations, someone who organized this meeting attempted to
explain his position. He argued that the meeting was about informing the public,
and that he felt he represented all the people in Philadelphia.
At
this point I took the microphone. I spoke about how the government has been
inspecting this refinery for as long as it has been in operation. The explosion
at the refinery, as well as the deaths due to respiratory diseases and cancer
represent clear evidence that the government has failed to properly inspect
this refinery. Any discussion that government officials have on this issue
needs to start with an admission that the government shares responsibility for
this disaster.
Then,
I noticed that two plain-clothed police officers were talking to an organizer
of our protest. When the meeting started to break up, I went out to the hallway
and noticed that there were about ten police officers lined up and ready for
action.
What can we do?
What
are the goals of these protests? We chanted again and again that we want clean
air to breathe and clean water to drink. These demands couldn’t be more clear.
However,
when we look at the operations of this refinery, and well as the indifference
by the government to proper inspections, these demands appear difficult to
achieve. The corporations that have owned the refinery have compromised safety.
While the government claims to represent all the people, their actions clearly
demonstrate that their priority is corporate profit over human needs.
The
evening before I attended this protest, I viewed the new film about the life of
Harriet Tubman. There was a scene in that film that I believe is relevant to
this discussion and I mentioned this at the protest.
Harriet
Tubman had escaped from slavery, and was planning to return to a slave
plantation to free more slaves. An abolitionist warned Tubman that this was too
dangerous. If she was captured she could have been tortured and or murdered.
Tubman
replied that this person didn’t know what it meant to be a slave, and all the
insidious horrors of that institution. The question was not whether she could
or could not free slaves. The question was that this must be done.
Yes,
we need to understand that a human life is a human life. Our lives are more
important than money. If the government refuses to properly cleanup that
refinery, then we will need a new government that has different priorities. Our
lives are more important than the corporate drive for profit.
No comments:
Post a Comment